Next: The Icing
Up: Critical Analysis 2: Redefining
Previous: Introduction
Fussell begins with a distinction in the ``standard'' view of class break
down in America. The traditional sociologist's model of the class break down
is roughly as follows:
- Upper Class
- Upper-Middle Class
- Middle Class
- Lower-Middle Class
- Lower Class
Fussell, on the other hand, breaks the classes into the following
sections:
- Top out-of-sight
- Upper
- Upper middle
- Middle
- High Prole
- Mid Prole
- Low Prole
- Destitute
- Bottom out-of-sight
The former model is based almost entirely on the amount of income,
or amount of money that you are worth. Whereas, Fussell states that money
alone does not define your class, hence the latter model.
In fact, Fussell points out that given two families living next to each other
making roughly the same amount of money, except that one's blue collar and the
other's white collar, their difference in behaviour and attitude, as well as
style, is much more noticeable. Here are two families, which are not at all
identical, yet their income is the same. It's not the fact that the uppers
have money, Fussell underscores, but rather how they have their
money that matters.
Subsections
Next: The Icing
Up: Critical Analysis 2: Redefining
Previous: Introduction
Elmo Recio
2000-08-14