... explanation.¹

See my Philosophy of Science essay on Michael Ruse and Larry Laudan's discourse on creation science not being verifiable. This was an extention of Karl Popper's minimum criteria for demarcation of science from non-science. [ http://polywog.navpoint.com/philosophy/science ].

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... McKnight²

See: Simon LeVay, The Sexual Brain, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993. Dean Hamer, The Science of Desire: The Search for the Gay Gene and the Biology of Behaviour, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994. Jim McKnight Straight Science? Homosexuality, Evolution and Adaptation, London: Routledge, 1997.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... theories.³

Some may also call this ``having your cake and eating it too.'' However, I insist that the positive aspects of both theories cover unique grounds which may lead to a better unifying understanding of the homosexual identity.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.