I have learned early in
my academic career through philosophical discourse that arguments
from analogy are quite weak. In calling into question the conclusion, we
only need to show that the similarity being claimed does not necessarily
entail the conclusion. The easiest way to do this is to find a
counter-example to the conclusion (another state of affairs which
shared all of the similarities of the two subjects, but which did not
have the first subject's additional property.)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.